Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge - Wikipedia
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 420 (1837), was a case regarding the Charles River Bridge and the Warren Bridge of Boston, Massachusetts, heard by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.
Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge …
In 1785, the Massachusetts legislature incorporated the Charles River Bridge Company to construct a bridge and collect tolls. In 1828, the legislature established the Warren Bridge Company to build a free bridge nearby. Unsurprisingly, the new bridge deprived the …
Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge ...
The proprietors of the Charles River Bridge filed a bill in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts against the proprietors of the Warren Bridge, first for an injunction to prevent the erection of the bridge and afterwards for general relief, stating that the act of the Legislature of Massachusetts authorizing the building of the Warren ...
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge - Encyclopedia Britannica
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, U.S. Supreme Court decision (1837) holding that rights not specifically conferred by a charter cannot be inferred from the language of the document. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney rejected the claim of a …
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge | Case Brief for Law …
Congress passed and act that allowed Plaintiff Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge to replace a ferry with a bridge over the Charles River. Congress then allowed Defendants the Proprietors of the Warren Bridge to build another bridge over the Charles River.
Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge
2024年3月28日 · In interpreting the Constitution’s Contract Clause, Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge stands for a narrow and literal interpretation of contracts between private entities and the state legislature.
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge - Case Brief Summary for …
The Supreme Court held that the charter granted to the Charles River Bridge Company did not imply an exclusive right to operate a bridge over the Charles River and that the Massachusetts legislature's granting of a charter to the Warren Bridge Company did not violate the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge | The Federalist Society
In 1828, the legislature established the Warren Bridge Company to build a free bridge nearby. Unsurprisingly, the new bridge deprived the old one of traffic and tolls. The Charles River Bridge Company filed suit, claiming the legislature had defaulted on its initial contract.
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge - U-S-History.com
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge. In 1785, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts had granted a charter to the Charles River Bridge Company, allowing it to construct and operate a toll bridge between Boston and Cambridge.
Charles River Bridge Case | Encyclopedia.com
2018年5月29日 · After hearing oral arguments in October 1829, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled in favor of the Warren Bridge proprietors. The Charles River Bridge group appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In March 1831, the Supreme Court first heard arguments in the case.
- 某些结果已被删除